Search for: "State v. Force" Results 8121 - 8140 of 32,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm by Ilya Somin
I described the key issues at stake in this 2017 post: In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
In July, the Seventh Circuit issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Emmis Communications Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm by Richard Hunt
New York State of Mind I was provided with the relevant papers in Andrews v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
On Aug. 7, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in D.C. to force Don McGahn, former White House counsel, to comply with the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:31 am by Eugene Volokh
For another case that takes the same view as Michigan, see State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:28 am by James Segroves
And following the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Azar v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A New York State Supreme Court granted Employee's petition for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Appointing Authority from continuing "her suspension without pay" and the Appointing Authority appealed.Was Employee entitled to the injunction? [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A New York State Supreme Court granted Employee's petition for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Appointing Authority from continuing "her suspension without pay" and the Appointing Authority appealed.Was Employee entitled to the injunction? [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]