Search for: "State v. Gaines"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
But state and federal law are strict when it comes to the proceeds of unlawful gain: assets can be forfeited to the government if they are used to commit of facilitate a crime, or if they have their origin in unlawful activity. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:19 am
Klem v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
De Havilland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
In the 9thCircuit, the IP exemption means federal IP; other circuits, and even California state law, include state based IP claims.Dogan: Need to argue on two levels: if yo [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In Ileto v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm
The amount stated in the good faith offer cannot be “less than the agency’s appraisal of just compensation. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
Sources at the State Capitol have indicated that the legislators do not believe the required 2/3 majority can be mustered for such a bill, and the split may also affect the ability of the Governor to gain consensus on the larger proposal. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
Rigsby gaining on the outside! [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
” Dumpson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm
United KingdomReid v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The right CAFTA would ensure that U.S. firms and workers are not asked to compete against companies in Central America that gain a competitive advantage by suppressing their workers. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
At the colloquium, several scholars reported that some jurisdictions in the world – and some U.S. states – allow for a more moderate and permissive interpretation of fiduciary duties. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:15 am
If I am wrong, please state so. [read post]
