Search for: "State v. N. N." Results 8121 - 8140 of 21,439
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
State, supra.The Court of Appeals then explains that, [o]n appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am by Kate Howard
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Summary judgment was also affirmed against his age and disability bias claims, as well as his claims under the FMLA (Tennial v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Considering such factors with respect to the Claimant’s relationship with the Authority, the Appellate Division held that the Board's finding that an employer-employee relationship existed between Claimant and the Housing Authority was supported by substantial evidence and declined to disturbed it.The Devore v DiNapoli Decision In Devore v DiNapoli the issue concerned the mirror image of an employer-employee relationship: service provided as an independent contractor. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:01 pm
.), “Acts of the State” in the Law of Responsibility: A Reassessment Mojtaba Kazazi (formerly, United Nations Compensation Commission), Compensation for Environmental Damage and Depletion of Natural Resources: The Practice of the United Nations Compensation Commission Georg Nolte (Humboldt Univ.), Treaties and their Practice Fabián Novak (Pontifical Catholic Univ. of Peru), The System of Reparations in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human… [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Copinger (17th ed), [22-18], p 1626, n 94 cites the Hong Kong case of Hksar v Chan Nai Mang (2005), in which it was held that the meaning of “affect prejudicially” was wide in scope and not necessarily restricted to economic prejudice, although that was the obvious area at which the section was directed. [read post]