Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8141 - 8160
of 21,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
By Mark S. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
He expressed doubt about the government's argument that trying the case would jeopardize state secrets, but said he would wait to decide the case until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on Hepting v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:43 pm
"The overriding consideration in this case," the judge ruled, "is that some of the very same issues Plaintiff presents here are currently pending for decision before the Supreme Court of the United States," citing the case of Baze v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:09 pm
Posted by David V. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:08 pm
A Washington Court of Appeals recently reviewed a DUI felony conviction in the case of State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
At yesterday’s oral argument in Fox v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:59 am
As demonstrated by the Sixth Circuit's recent decision in Farhner v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:43 pm
United State Dept. of Labor. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
(b) Is a court of a Member State permitted to apply a national provision (here the second sentence of Paragraph 26(3) of the Law on trade marks (MarkenG)) which conflicts with a provision of a directive (here Article 10(1) and (2)(a) of Directive 89/104/EEC) in cases in which the facts of the case had already occurred prior to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in which indications of the incompatibility of the Member State's legislation with the… [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 3:16 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 2:55 pm
See, e.g., UCB, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Marie-Andree Weiss of The 1709 Blog discusses the Paramount Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:52 am
Mark D. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
H that the case was marked "final" and that Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:07 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm
This is true whatever formal test the courts have used, either the proportionality test outside the US, which expressly calls for judges to weigh the costs and benefits of a measure, or the Employment Division v. [read post]
