Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8141 - 8160
of 16,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2019, 5:22 am
This is a risky proposition—and, to make matters worse, there is little evidence that it is actually true. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
This can't possibly be consistent with the First Amendment; indeed, in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:46 pm
But they won’t be addressed if the first-cut distributional effects are an intended feature, not a bug. [read post]
24 May 2016, 12:23 pm
Policing this legal boundary matters because we risk cannibalizing CDA 230, which provides that intermediaries are not liable for the third-party content that they host. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Good things don’t always come to those who wait. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:59 pm
[I actually don't do that these days, but never mind that.] [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:52 am
Don’t worry whether you have a legitimate cause of action or defense. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
This isn’t the beginning of a “war on leaks. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Maybe that is what Anderson .Paak is singing about after all in his famous song ‘Your (he)art don’t stand a chance’ (...if you don’t expressly voice your intention or put it in your will!). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
I don’t know if the state can prove that Dr. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
This dispute is one of those.The background to this case is well-summarized by SLATE Supreme Court reporters Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:38 pm
One day or so you suddenly see it (if you're lucky enough), and then for a very long time, you don't. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:50 am
The venue only holds 70, so please don't leave it too late if you'd like to join us on 4 September. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:55 pm
According to a GE's motion for summary judgment (asking the court to rule in its favor as a matter of law), My Health “did not [have] a single document showing the actual sale of any goods or services under the purported MY HEATLH mark. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
Professor Beebe suggested that their interests should matter too, and that they could be benefiting from information imparted by trademarks, even if a (lesser) number of consumers are getting the wrong message. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:37 am
The attorneys contend that "[i]t is not appropriate for consideration and - even at this late hour - the allegations the Government 'would have' or 'could have' made remain short of the mark." [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Meat eaters shouldn’t have to be exclusive to just one wiener. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:29 am
This is brinkmanship, but relations between the Executive and Legislative have often been marked by brinkmanship. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:09 am
It didn’t exist.... [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
A strip of tape on the floor marked the line I could not cross, two feet away from Orlando’s gurney. [read post]
