Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 8141 - 8160 of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
So it is with the arbitration contract, which the UK Supreme Court has discussed at length in its recent judgment in Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 9:02 am by Colette Vogele
He was asked to return in subsequent years and in addition to creating websites for both Senator DeWine and Senator George V. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:15 am by Brenda Fulmer
In August of 2011, Public Citizen fired the first shot across the bow in our attempts to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in PLIVA v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:26 pm by Katharine Van Tassel
There is a basic difference between direct state interference with a protected activity and state encouragement of an alternative activity consonant with legislative policy.This body of jurisprudence opens the door for programs like the one being pilot tested in West Virginia that I blogged on last week over at the Health Law Prof Blog. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:35 am by Joy Waltemath
He passed, but the doctor said he required workplace accommodations to mitigate the risks from his impaired vision. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:08 am by Altman & Altman
Typically, a judge would order the defendant to be evaluated at a state mental health hospital, and a doctor would ask that he be held. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
A 1983 Irish Law Reform Commission Report on Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Jactitation of Marriage and Related Rights cites the 1820 English case of Lord Hawke v Corri (1820), 2 Hag. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He made inappropriate comments when Kaytor went to a gynecologist appointment, stating, among other things, that the doctor was going where men would love to go. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am by Bexis
  We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The commissioner said she would have to be “cleared” by a county doctor. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by Matt Johnston
” So states an order of the Montana Supreme Court, in Office of State Public Defender on Behalf of L.K. v. [read post]