Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 8141 - 8160 of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
(b) Where the original intention is not immediately apparent, the requester bears the burden of proof, which must be a heavy one (J 8/80, loc.cit., Reasons No. 6). [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:26 am by Bexis
  The Supreme Court in Bates v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
  The Final Rules state that the Pay Versus Performance Disclosure will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under either the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) except to the extent that the issuer affirmatively does incorporate it by reference. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
(j) (1) In enacting the amendments to this section made by Assembly Bill 2086 of the 1997-98 Regular Session, it is the intent of the Legislature to respond to the holding in Birbrower v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Stephen Page
They must also be provided with a signed statement by thelegalpractitioner stating that the advice was given to the party.2.38Item 4 removes the requirement that the original agreement is given to oneofthe spouse parties and a copy be given to each of the otherparties.2.39 Item 3 is a minor technical amendment as a consequence of theproposedrepeal of section 90G(1)(e).2.40 Items 5 – 7 mirror theamendments proposed at items 2 - 4 by applying thesame requirements forspouse… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]