Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
State, 168 N.E.2d 372, 373 (N.Y. 1960). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
According to the Appellate Division, §75 requires that:The charges must be reasonably specific in light of the circumstances, which include "whether the interval ascribed for a particular offense is so excessive on its face that it is unreasonable; whether the respondent has exerted diligent efforts to state the time more specifically; and whether, under the circumstances, the designated period is reasonable. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:51 pm
Raich, supra, 545 U.S. 1, 26-29; United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:33 am
Huawei antisuit injunction by Judge William Orrick might have been overturned (based on how the appellate hearing went and in light of a question the court asked post-hearing) had the parties not settled"Always": European Court of Justice in Turner v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
The second case argued on December 10, 2008, AT&T v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 10:02 am
Schafer v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:53 am
See BMC Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 2:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
” It notes that we stated in McPherson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court watchers could be forgiven if last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
The court distinguished United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
(Additional STL coverage here.)The case cite is Experience Hendrix LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court today denied the certiorari petition in Kiyemba v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:10 am
Back in June 2007, IPBiz noted that a response of patent practitioners to KSR v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
By the early twentieth century, most states had concluded that this informal arrangement was inadequate in light of the number of benefits and responsibilities that had been added to the status of marriage through federal and state laws. [read post]
