Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 8141 - 8160 of 23,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 5:44 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
Earlier today the Digital Media Law Project, through our counsel at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, joined a brief filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts case Tuteur v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
”  Having exhausted her administrative remedies, Plaintiff filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Contingent permanent appointments Cruz v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
In my post lauding the Obama Administration for plainly stating, in its latest filing in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA”) case, that “the United States does not believe that DOMA is rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child-rearing,” I predicted “eruption of the right-wing volcanos. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
Mr Flood was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part (Freeman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
Similarly, in Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn., 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division ruled that a CBA provision that allowed a teacher to be absent with pay on "any of the religious holidays designated by the New York State Commissioner of Education" without charging his or her absence to leave credits violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
United States, No. 05-5713 "Denial of petition for habeas relief, alleging that court-appointed counsel failed to timely petition for certiorari review is vacated and remanded where, construing the appeal as motion to recall the mandate, the motion is granted, the judgment vacated, and the matter is remanded in accordance with Wilkins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:34 pm
  Because they were nontestimonial, their admission did not violate the Confrontation Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. [read post]