Search for: "BANKS V. STATE"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 15,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
This type of prior art is especially prevalent in the CBM context as many such patents were pursued in the late 1990s in response to State Street Bank, and as a precursor to the “dot-com-bubble. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 4:12 pm
Cox v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
See, Silva v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
’ ” United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:03 pm
Banks, 85 N.Y.2d 558, 562 (1995).In People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm
In Singh v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
-substantial-compliance case, State Bank of Cherry v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
In May 2013, the decision came down in City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
Kimberlin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
The Court stated that the Lewis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:49 am
On August 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:49 am
Supreme Court in its 1994 decision in O’Melveny & Myers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:47 pm
The payments the trustee did make were made in U.S. dollars, beneficiaries being resident in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm
In Zeltser, et. al v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
Not surprisingly, the decision of the latest Federal Circuit case on software patent eligibility – Accenture Global Services, GMBH v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
