Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 9,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA's maximum obligation for all services provided under the contract was $ 32,098 for April 1 through June 30, 1999; $128,390 from July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000; and $128,390 from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2001. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Table 1. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
Section 7-1-102) 5. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs 1 and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
Greg Lambert 4:35 I love the fact that that even Holloway was was was using it as well. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
§ 1320a-7(a)(1)-(4). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:02 am
As many as 53 sickens, 13 hospitalized with 1 likely liver transplant. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:25 am
As many as 53 sickens, 13 hospitalized with 1 likely liver transplant. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
I think that is because the theme underlying this symposium is a concept that I not only disagree with, but is also one that is frequently advanced in some corners—that technological innovations have so dramatically transformed the financial markets since the 1930s, when Congress first passed the federal securities laws and created the SEC to enforce them,[1] that those laws are now somehow ill-suited to regulate our financial markets, especially when it comes to crypto assets. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
5 (1). [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:00 am
”[35] The PRC’s leadership clearly wants to restrict lower government authorities to the rule of law. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
This appeal arises from a legislative invocation given by an invited, guest speaker before the opening of a Jacksonville 1 I. [read post]
7 May 2020, 2:55 am
In other words, “a business profit incurs an immediate tax liability, while a business loss does not always yield an immediate tax benefit. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
Where does that stop? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Jones did have a cause of action for the invasion of her privacy, it would fall in Professor Prosser’s first category of invasion of privacy, namely intrusion upon seclusion.[1] For her case, Ms. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 2:39 pm
Here are their answers, lightly edited and excerpted, using numbers instead of names for privacy reasons: [1.] [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
