Search for: "FIRST MERIT" Results 8161 - 8180 of 32,704
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
The court also issued orders from last week’s conference, adding one case to its merits docket for next year: Van Buren v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:03 pm by Scott McKeown
In a zinger of a footnote that is likely to irritate PTAB critics, the majority addressed the argument that the PTAB is somehow unfair in its review of patents: Why should that bureaucracy be trusted to give an honest count on first view, but a jaundiced one on second look? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The post Justices add computer fraud case to merits docket appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm by Derek T. Muller
”To one larger point that probably merits much more attention from me in some more formal way…. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Such anti-libel injunctions, following a judgment on the merits, are generally viewed as constitutional by most courts that have recently considered the matter.) [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
Petitioners’ Opening Brief on the merits was filed February 10, 2020, and Respondent’s and Real Parties’ Answer Briefs were due on April 10, 2020, a date set prior to the COVID‑19 emergency orders, but have apparently (as of this post’s drafting) not yet been filed. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am by Dennis Crouch
Why should that bureaucracy be trusted to give an honest count on first view, but a jaundiced one on second look? [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
And after more careful examination of the merits of the plaintiffs’ federal claims in the federal district court in Wisconsin, the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am by Eric Goldman
The Court agrees—Caesars’ objections are without merit. * Las Vegas Skydiving Adventures v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 7:48 am
 Finding no merit in any of the College's arguments, the Court affirmed the judgment of the District Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 6:40 pm by Howard Friedman
Kunkel’s Public Health Emergency Order (4-11-20-PHO)..., which restricts places of worship from gathering more than five people within a single room or connected space, violates Plaintiff Legacy Church’s rights under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment....; and (ii) whether Legacy Church is likely to succeed on the merits in demonstrating that the Order violates [its]... rights to peaceably assemble under the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:07 pm by Andrew Delaney
SCOV now looks at the merits of the surviving issues: (1) whether Allco established the right to intervene in its first motion and (2) whether the PSB erred when it denied Allco permissive intervention. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court need not even go so far to determine that Legacy Church will not succeed on the merits. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Legacy Church contends that the April 11 Order violates the First Amendment because it is underinclusive; it exempts certain secular activities that also entail large gatherings. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:01 am by Eric Goldman
He has failed to point to any specific creative expression that would merit copyright protection. * Mango v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 2:52 am by Squire Patton Boggs
The post Cert Watch: Supreme Court to review split Sixth Circuit FTCA decision on election-of-remedies appeared first on Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
  (Even though the defendant here, too, actually denied on the merits that this was in fact the case.)It's a somewhat minor point, to be sure. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 11:36 am by Andrew Vey
The now dismissed co-worker in turn sued the employer for wrongful dismissal and the complainant for defamation.Before the court could hear the merits of the case, a procedural question arose concerning how evidence should be gathered. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
First, the defendants had won “across the board. [read post]