Search for: "In Re Robert"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 15,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 12:48 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion provides some language suggesting the high court was not radically re-reading precedent on the commerce clause. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
I’m happy to see that we’re now about to put the idea to the test. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:31 am
John Roberts may have essentially saved the democracy - not a minor point. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:31 am
John Roberts may have essentially saved the democracy - not a minor point. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:27 am
You're working on that opinion on a computer, connected to the internet, where everyone is talking about what you are doing. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
Roberts went out of his way to stop "his fellow liberals" (especially Ginsburg) in their tracks and prevent them from re-invorigating the commerce clause by using the clause to justify congress's power to force all americans to buy health insurance. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
The judge gave Goldsmith time to speak with Rakofsky to see what they would withdraw, cautioning the plaintiff: “I don’t think you’re going to like my decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Dissent (Jefferson, 3 votes): PDF In re XL Specialty Ins. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
Her enigmatic, knowing smile comes to mind each time I re-read Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
Roberts, Jr., filed a separate opinion, while joining in the denial of review, because he was skeptical that the FCC has, in fact, switched its policy regarding broadcast imagery. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
See, In re City of Stockton, California, Case No. 12-32118 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
See, In re City of Stockton, California, Case No. 12-32118 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:13 am
Which means your current workforce is either going to have to work harder (to make up for that missing 50th employee), or you’re going to need to scale back even further. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Raich, the Court held that the Feds could criminalize the production and use of home-grown marijuana, because of the possibleeffecton interstate commerce: if you’re growing your own weed, that means you’re not buying it from someplace else, which might be out of state, so your choice affects the price that is charged for the drug on a national level. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
Roberts was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan to reach this result. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:44 am
DUST NLRB Using Tech 2 Reach PPL re: PCA? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:01 am
Robert Hoggarth, Senior Policy Director, ICANN Ms. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
I know you're all poring over the Affordable Care Act, now that we have to comply with it, and trying to decide whether Chief Justice John Roberts is an evil turncoat, or a hero, or a "double agent" for the ACA's opponents . . . or for its advocates. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:21 am
(Until some pretentious hack with a law degree and an agenda proposes to re-litigate questions about whether it's the kind of tax that the Constitution authorizes, that is) [read post]
