Search for: "State v. Black"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm
“In support of its decision, the court invoked a 1995 Supreme Court case, Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 1:07 pm
The state-sponsored racial discrimination faced by white South Africans is nowhere near as bad as that endured by blacks under apartheid, or by many oppressed minorities around the world today. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
" The recent Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 10:39 am
Azar v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am
The lower house, the State Duma, yesterday voted unanimously to authorize the illegal annexation, Russia’s state-run TASS news agency reported. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
In the video was the blurred face of man, Cordle, admitting to barhopping, blacking out and driving home drunk. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
In the video was the blurred face of man, Cordle, admitting to barhopping, blacking out and driving home drunk. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Lee v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Rodríguez-Vélez for the District of Puerto Rico; Director John Morton of U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Rodríguez-Vélez for the District of Puerto Rico; Director John Morton of U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
Almost all states allow property brought into the marriage to remain non-marital. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
E.g., Barnes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
” A crowning achievement of Reconstruction and a self-conscious repudiation of the Supreme Court’s egregiously wrong ruling in Dred Scott (holding that Black persons, whether free or enslaved, could not be citizens of America), this clause constitutionally guarantees citizenship for “all persons” who are “born . . . in the United States” and who are “subject to [its] jurisdiction. [read post]
