Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8161 - 8180 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:06 am by Richard Renner
S. 164, 168 (2008) (search incident to an arrest that was illegal under state law was reasonable); California v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:08 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ConnecticutOpinion Date: 6/1/10Cite: Genworth Financial Wealth Mgmt., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IAM)   United Kingdom Coexistence and the Omega saga: Omega Engineering Inc v Omega SA and others (IPKat) When picking a vaccum cleaner design, watch for the sucker punch... [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:40 am by SHG
The Great Writ was important enough at the time the United States was formed to make it into the Constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:08 am by Stephen Page
25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by INFORRM
  In Steel and Morris v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) it was held that an award of £40,000 against defendants of modest resources was disproportionate ([96]). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm by Keith Rizzardi
SUMMARY: Arizona Cattle Growers' Association (“Arizona Cattle”) appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment rejecting its challenge to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (“FWS”) designation of critical habitat for the Mexican Spotted Owl. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:44 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 2106, we remand this case to the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California to determine different district judge. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Woodrow Pollack
I doubt it will, as the burden remains on the defendants to prove that they didn't intend to deceive.Pequignot v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:13 pm
While Rule 52(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contains the pertinent qualification that a "court is not required to state findings or conclusions when ruling on a motion under Rule 12 or 56," that rule "does not relieve a court of the burden of stating its reasons somewhere in the record when its underlying holdings would otherwise be ambiguous or inascertainable [sic]," Couveau v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
In the United States, these minorities tend to be black. [read post]