Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 801 - 820
of 11,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
The Maryland Special Court of Appeals issued an opinion last week in a case that should be read by every Maryland personal injury lawyer who is putting up or cross examining expert witnesses at trial. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
The Maryland Special Court of Appeals issued an opinion last week in a case that should be read by every Maryland personal injury lawyer who is putting up or cross examining expert witnesses at trial. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:05 pm
The gist of the article is that the appeals court has taken the place of the judge and jury. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:26 am
Best of luck with any appeals! [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:00 pm
His basic claim is that DOJ provided “discoverable material” in a form that could not read or accessed. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Given the sloppy examination VA applies, it’s clear VA counts on the historically low appeal rate to cover its tracks. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:14 am
Continue reading [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:14 am
Continue reading [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:16 pm
A literal reading of the New York statutory scheme might lend support to this argument. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:31 am
The Director oversees students working in teams on examinations, administrative appeals, collection matters, and cases before the United States Tax Court, Federal District Courts and Appeals, as well as on comments projects relating to guidance issued by the IRS or Treasury. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:43 pm
Informative Decision Led to Confusion Last month the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) designated Ex Parte Jung 2016-008290, “informative. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
” Case Background In this product liability case, the plaintiffs sued the defendant after their motorhome...Read the whole entry... [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 2:17 pm
Given the various admonitions and other curative efforts here, the Court of Appeal holds that there was no prejudice in not ordering a mistrial.Still: Freaky, eh? [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
Cir. 1986)(citations omitted).NoteBecause we have affirmed at least one ground of rejection withrespect to each claim on appeal, the Examiner’s decision is affirmed. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is one such court. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:58 am
Over on the Drug & Device Law blog, Reed Smith partner Steven Boranian examines the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Corber v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:02 am
… Read the rest >> [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:00 pm
Ellis awarded the plaintiff damages, attorneys’ fees and some requested costs, as well as granting the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions and ordering the defendants to reimburse the plaintiff $12,800 for the cost of conducting a forensic computer examination, which the plaintiff maintained was necessitated by Defendants’ evasive and...Read the whole entry... [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 3:45 pm
In addition to the issues discussed by the Court of Appeals in Jenkins v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:44 pm
Continue reading [read post]
