Search for: "Agency of Natural Resources v. Persons"
Results 801 - 820
of 978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
” People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
First, Troxel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Net impression is what matters, to a reasonable person in target audience. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Such decisions are discretionary based on facts and circumstances, but the untested nature of the DPA carries some risk. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
All in all, it doesn’t seem like a particularly natural breeding ground for libertarians. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
Evidence showed that while the Guidelines may have been distributed, and may even be known by, teachers and other persons that make copies of published works, there was insufficient evidence of the extent of the compliance with those Guidelines. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
Except for the surprising outcome that would potentially give it almost $10 million per annum based almost solely on the reproduction of “consumables” (assuming all school boards actually decide to pay – which is very doubtful - see below), AC lost badly on just about every other conceivable aspect – including some very important ones such as fair dealing, insubstantial copying, and its agency by ratification argument, about which the Board has effectively, even if… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
Except for the surprising outcome that would potentially give it almost $10 million per annum based almost solely on the reproduction of “consumables” (assuming all school boards actually decide to pay – which is very doubtful - see below), AC lost badly on just about every other conceivable aspect – including some very important ones such as fair dealing, insubstantial copying, and its agency by ratification argument, about which the Board has effectively, even if… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
Evidence showed that while the Guidelines may have been distributed, and may even be known by, teachers and other persons that make copies of published works, there was insufficient evidence of the extent of the compliance with those Guidelines. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
That decision followed a complaint by Mr Michael Bateman, Director, Human Resources of the ACT Department of Education and Training (the Department) concerning a letter the solicitor had written to the Chief Executive of the Department on 24 October 2006.3. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm
Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases (V) (关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释（五)). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm
Company Law Interpretation (V) (Issued in late April, text found here, official commentary here). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:46 am
Sometimes even the nature of a telephone conversation may need additional security. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The doctors had no personal knowledge that claims for nondiagnostic tests were presented to the government, nor do they allege facts that strongly support an inference that such billings were submitted. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 10:48 am
The agency that oversees non-compliant U.S. persons and enforces penalties is the IRS. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
