Search for: "Booker v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 1,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2004, 10:14 am
There are bookmarks in the PDF file, so that if the file is opened with Acrobat, a list of the included documents appears.The one document I have left out is the July 16, 2004, report of the National Center for State Courts: Blakely v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm by Michael O'Hear
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:42 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
  A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am by Jackie McDermott
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:49 pm by Mary Whisner
” . . .The Commission also addresses the overcrowding in the federal Bureau of Prisons, which is over-capacity by 37 percent. . . .The report was undertaken pursuant to a directive from Congress to examine mandatory minimum penalties, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Booker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:48 pm by Mary Whisner
” . . .The Commission also addresses the overcrowding in the federal Bureau of Prisons, which is over-capacity by 37 percent. . . .The report was undertaken pursuant to a directive from Congress to examine mandatory minimum penalties, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Booker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]