Search for: "C. P.1"
Results 801 - 820
of 11,725
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2021, 1:49 pm
Evid. 801(c)(1), and the rule defines a “statement” as “a person’s oral assertion, written assertion, or nonverbal conduct, if the person intended it as an assertion,” Fed. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 5:07 pm
The latest issue of the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Vol. 21, no. 1, March 2023) is out. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:10 pm
Boyle, UNCLOS dispute settlement and the uses and abuses of part XV P. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am
Moore & Paul C. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
: New Sources on the 1809 Motion to Vacate Jacob Henry's North Carolina State Legislative Seat, (November 25, 2019).Daniel P. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:14 pm
A Case Comment Pierrot Damien Massi Lombat, Les sources et fondements de l’obligation de coopérer avec la Cour pénale internationale Pierre Antoine Vaillancourt, Hot pursuit : moyen dépassé pour assurer le respect des normes dans les eaux d'un État côtier? [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
.- Bekhol Derakhekha Daehu of Bar Ilan University, forthcoming).Christopher C. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:54 am
From SSRN:Yuval Shany, The Road Taken: ICCPR and discriminatory restrictions on religious freedom, (Harvard Human Rights Journal (forthcoming in 2021)).Anthony Aladekomo, Analysis of Intersection between Law and Religion, (July 13, 2020).Audra Savage, The Religion of Race: The Supreme Court as Priests of Racial Politics, (Utah Law Review, Forthcoming).Christopher C. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
Concluyó que el Congreso solamente excluyó a Puerto Rico de la sección §109(c), que impide al ELA autorizar a sus municipalidades e instrumentalides públicas el acogerse al Capítulo 9 pero el Congreso no excluyó a Puerto Rico de la provisión que impide que los estados legislen sus propias legislaciones de quiebra para sus municipalidades e instrumentalidades bajo la §903(1). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:07 am
Holding Corp., 51 USPQ2d 1759, 1761 (TTAB 2013); and see FRCP 26(c)(1). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:54 am
P. 50. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
Accordingly, as the Court of First Instance essentially held in paragraph 55 of the judgment under appeal, the legality of those decisions must be assessed solely on the basis of that regulation and not on the basis of a previous decision-making practice of those boards (Case C 37/03 P BioID v OHIM [2005] ECR I-0000, paragraph 47). [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 4:13 am
p, onun veya ba? [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:25 am
Controversias Las controversias del presente caso son las siguientes: (1) ¿Cómo se puede evidenciar que un negocio privado está debidamente autorizado por el Servicio Postal de los Estados Unidos para realizar servicios análogos a los del servicio postal? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:21 am
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany), to be dealt with through the accelerated procedure, was lodged on 16 June 2010 in case C- 296/10 (Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez, noch ein mal). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:34 pm
See 1 C. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
., No. 95 C 4088, Slip Op. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
Code§ 20001(a)-(c)) (Franchise Act). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:02 am
., No. 10 C 204, Slip Op. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:34 pm
Westermann Lernspielverlag v EUIPO, case C-482/15 P at paras. 27 et seqq.). [read post]
