Search for: "Canning v. Washington County" Results 801 - 820 of 1,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court of Washington reached the same conclusion we reach today in State v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
Washington, fails to protect the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and the 14th Amendment right to due process when, in death-penalty cases involving flagrantly deficient performance, courts can deny relief following a truncated “no prejudice” analysis that does not account for the evidence amassed in a habeas proceeding and relies on a trial record shaped by trial counsel’s ineffective representation. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is proof that compromise is still possible in the halls of the United States Congress and that Washington can still work for manufacturers and citizens across the country. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Ronald Mann
  The Washington Supreme Court ruled for the landowners based on an “in-rem” exception that it discerned in the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Yakima v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am by Lawrence Taylor
The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office said it would undertake a special monthlong review to determine how many of the cases it would drop because San Jose police officers used the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer as part of their field sobriety tests. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
Finally, in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, although the term “Beware” when read in context with the electronic docket list can be interpreted in a way that disparages Snow Systems as a business, it can also, as Tanner correctly observes, be subject to a number of innocent innocuous interpretations, “including a warning to other business regarding the litigiousness of society, a warning about conducting business in Cook County, and a warning about [the dangers] of operating a snow… [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
The editorial board of The Washington Times weighs in on Arab Bank v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:29 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Rejects Statistical Significance as Requirement to Plead Materiality - Dallas lawyer Vance Wittie of Sedgwick on the firm's blog, The Appellate Strategist Prince George's County, Maryland Adopts a Different Approach to Pay-to-Play - Washington, DC attorney Stefan Passantino of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm's Pay to Play Law Blog Is Warren Buffett Telling the Truth? [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
When Can a Judge Overturn a Jury Verdict? [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” Charlotte Garden analyzes Monday’s argument in Fort Bend County v. [read post]