Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 6,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Individuals may be disqualified for employment because of misrepresentations in employment applicationMartin v Marchiselli, 262 AD2d 171Section 50.4 of the Civil Service Law authorizes the state department of civil service or the responsible civil service commission to disqualify and terminate an applicant or an employee if he or she has materially misrepresented his or her qualifications on the application form. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Peck, cases on state bills of credit in the Jacksonian era, the Legal Tender cases, and Pollock v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
In Case R 513/2011-2 Société des Produits Nestlé S.A v Cadbury Holdings Ltd, Nestlé appealed a decision of the Cancellation Division finding the three-dimensional Community trade mark, consisting of four trapezoidal bars aligned on a rectangular base for 'Sweets; bakery products, pastries, biscuits; cakes, waffles' in Class 30, was devoid of distinctive character and had therefore been invalidly registered contrary to Art. 7(1)(b), Reg. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:20 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:33 pm
VIRGINIA STATE BAR, EX REL. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm
United States was all about this concept. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 11:00 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:58 am
The issue in Helsinn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi challenged ITRSHRA in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
Employers Need To Be Careful To Avoid Waiving The Protections Of Written Computer And Email Policies
20 Jun 2008, 9:22 pm
The Ninth Circuit's June 18, 2008 decision in Quon v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:01 am
Laurel Twp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
Cyberheat CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
State Bar of California, 58 Cal.4th at p. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
This question was raised on appeal in Michela v St. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
