Search for: "Crawford v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 1,617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Christa Culver
MillerDocket: 10-851Issue(s): (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in concluding that "established law" for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) is based on the law in effect when the state conviction becomes final; and (2) even if reviewed de novo, did the Sixth Circuit err in concluding that the suicide note here was "testimonial" under principles explained in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Bennett, consolidated with McComish v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm by Mike
Assuming the truth of these allegations, as the Court instructed in Crawford-El [v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:22 am by Richard D. Friedman
It is important to bear in mind that he was the author of both Crawford and Davis. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The pre-AEDPA Teague doctrine would have applied the new rule in this circumstance.The underlying substantive question is what constitutes a "testimonial" statement for the purpose of Crawford v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
MillerDocket: 10-851Issue(s): (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in concluding that "established law" for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) is based on the law in effect when the state conviction becomes final; and (2) even if reviewed de novo, did the Sixth Circuit err in concluding that the suicide note here was "testimonial" under principles explained in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by Donna
You don’t have to be the one who complained to be protected: In 2009, in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
  A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]