Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 801 - 820
of 136,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2017, 6:54 am
Sleepy’s, LLC, 220 N.J. 289 (2015), a New Jersey appellate panel held, in Garden State Fireworks, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In Baker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 8:27 am
Circuit’s reasoning in Abbas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:46 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, agreed with the school district's position, holding held that the use the right to free speech protected by the First Amendment does not extend to the in-class curricular speech of teachers in primary and secondary schools made “pursuant to” their official duties, citing Garcetti v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:55 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:03 am
In Arista Records v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:52 pm
A father who chooses to acknowledge parentage does not need to attest that he is the child's biological father, and the statutory term "acknowledged father" does not reference biological parentage. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:47 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Tuesday in Kansas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals holds that a Vermont woman who suffered retaliation after speaking to the newspaper and testifying before a public board about job-related matters does not have a claim under the First Amendment because her speech was not protected under the Supreme Court's Garcetti decision, which holds that speech is unprotected if the plaintiff made it pursuant to her official job duties.The case is Bearss v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:14 am
We see how that all works out in a recent Second Circuit decision that upholds a New York City gun regulation against a Second Amendment challenge.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:03 am
Cir. 2019).Of note:While the machine-or-transformation test remains “a useful and important clue” for determining eligibility under§ 101, Bilski v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:15 am
This can be seen in Morgan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 1:00 pm
Westrock Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:34 am
The study is Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, Does Disclosure Matter? [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:20 am
For example in People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:42 am
Many claims die because the plaintiff does not have a property or liberty interest, the deprivation of which is necessary for the government to provide you fair process. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 9:33 am
See People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
McIntire v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 4:39 am
That Doe did not refile by the 9/18 refile deadline and has been identified in the case documents. [read post]
