Search for: "Doe v. Lee" Results 801 - 820 of 3,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
Sirona Dental Systems GMBH v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 8:22 am
Awaiting Warner-Lambert v ActavisOver at the IP Alchemist blog, former Kat Darren Smyth takes a look at the recent decision from the CJEU in the case of Teva v Gilead C-121/17: Teva v Gilead – C-121/17 provides some clarity on combination products. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:25 am by Douglas C. Melcher
July 23, 2015) in which it considered, inter alia, whether to adopt the “rescue doctrine” which “‘allows an individual injured while attempting to rescue another from peril to recover in tort from the person whose negligence caused the situation.'” Id. at 21 (quoting Lee v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:25 am by Douglas C. Melcher
July 23, 2015) in which it considered, inter alia, whether to adopt the “rescue doctrine” which “‘allows an individual injured while attempting to rescue another from peril to recover in tort from the person whose negligence caused the situation.'” Id. at 21 (quoting Lee v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Other contributors include Alice Ristroph, Eva Nilsen, Richard Frase, John Stinneford, Rachel Barkow, David Gray, and Youngjae Lee. [read post]