Search for: "Does 1-25, Inclusive" Results 801 - 820 of 1,143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
From January 17, 2015 to January 19, 2015, I have received approximately 80 [calls] from a phone number which I know belongs to [Marian].On February 25, 2015, at approximately 11:00PM, I entered the Bowery Electric at 327 Bowery. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, for example, subdivision 1 of section 366-a of the Social Services Law provides, in pertinent part: "Any person requesting medical assistance may make application therefor in person, Through another in his behalf or by mail". [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:07 am by Arina Shulga
With regard to the equity provisions, the “less than 25%” of equity which does not have to be held by licensed professional employees must, in the alternative, be held by non-professional employees and/or an ESOP. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
In particular, Rule 26(b) authorizes discovery substantially broader than what is required for inclusion in an expert witness’s report. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Lougheed Block Inc., 2014 ABCA 234 (36123) Does the federal Interest Act limit mortgage rates. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  Inclusion of a pharmacogenomic test in the labeling would be contingent upon its performance characteristics.FDA, Guidance for Industry, Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions, at 5 (March 2005) (available here). [read post]
24 May 2015, 5:22 pm
Small and Medium Size Enterprises Your rapporteur is of the opinion that SMEs should be put in the position to participate in the EU system if they want to be part of the avant-garde, but does not want to force them. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
’” (That’s Exodus 21:23-25 for those of you following [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In an interesting May 1, 2015 memo (here), Thomas S. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
  Defendants argued that (1) they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiffs’ warnings claim was preempted, under principles of implied conflict preemption; and 2) plaintiffs failed to prove causation because their causation expert was unqualified to render his causation opinions. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
First, the statutory limit on basic child support does not reflect current economic reality. [read post]