Search for: "FORD MOTOR CO" Results 801 - 820 of 1,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 11:41 am by K&L Gates
”  Defendants bolstered their argument by citing to In re Ford Motor Co., 345 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2003), a case in which the plaintiff’s request for direct access to Ford’s databases in order to search for additional claims analogous to her own was denied on appeal in the absence of “some condition such as improper conduct on the part of the responding party” and because “the district court failed to state any abuse of the… [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:58 am
And earlier this year, a New York federal judge allowed claims to move forward alleging that several major multinational companies, including General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co., aided and abetted human-rights violations by providing goods and services to South Africa’s apartheid regime. [read post]
24 May 2015, 7:16 am by Robert Kreisman
In 2004, a woman was paralyzed when her Ford Explorer rolled over and a jury entered a $369 million verdict against Ford Motor Co. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
  In Engenious, Plaintiff sued Ford Motor Co for breaches of various contracts. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:18 am by Julie Lam
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) in Vrooman v Ford Motor Co, No. 142824, and remanded the case to the Board of Magistrates for additional findings of fact and conclusions of law, for the reasons stated in the WCAC dissenting opinion. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITMotor VehiclesWhen Ford Motor Credit Has Security Interest in Car It Must Be Party to Forfeiture Within 25 Days of DemandFord Motor Credit Co., plf. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 7:13 am by Moseley Collins
Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 548 [ Where contributory negligence is asserted as a defense, and where there is "some evidence of a substantial character" to support a finding that such negligence occurred, it is prejudicial error to refuse an instruction on this issue, since defendant is thereby denied a basic theory of his defense ] overruled on other grounds in Soule v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:19 pm by Scott McKeown
” In the two panel decisions reviewed by the Director (Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:33 am by Moseley Collins
Ford Motor Co., supra, 19 Cal.3d at p. 548 [ the fact that evidence is circumstantial does not mean that it cannot be substantial. . . . the jury is entitled to accept persuasive circumstantial evidence even where contradicted by direct testimony ]; see also Scott v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm by James Galvin
The following is a list of some of the UBS Reverse Convertible Notes offered: CUSIP Issuer Product Name 90261J426 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Starbucks Corp. 90261J434 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Intel Corp. 90261J459 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Apple, Inc. 90261J319 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked linked to Occidental Petroleum Corp. 90261J343 UBS… [read post]