Search for: "H. v. H." Results 801 - 820 of 15,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm by NL
After reviewing the precedent cases (Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1, Stuart v Goldberg Linde (a firm) [2008] 1 WLR 823 ) and noting that it would be "wrong to hold that because a matter could have been raised in earlier proceedings it should have been, so as to render the raising of it in later proceedings necessarily abusive" (Lord Bingham in Johnson), and the Art 6 entitlement to access to justice for an arguable case, the Court of Appeal found that… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm by NL
After reviewing the precedent cases (Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1, Stuart v Goldberg Linde (a firm) [2008] 1 WLR 823 ) and noting that it would be "wrong to hold that because a matter could have been raised in earlier proceedings it should have been, so as to render the raising of it in later proceedings necessarily abusive" (Lord Bingham in Johnson), and the Art 6 entitlement to access to justice for an arguable case, the Court of Appeal found that… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 8/19/09Cite: Perry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:03 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miss H v East Sussex County Council & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 249 (31 March 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) D. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am by David Smith
Thompson v Hurst [2012] EWCA Civ 1752This is a rather fact specific case which shows application of the principles of Stack v Dowden and Kernott v Jones. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:20 am
The Hoover Institution Library and Archives has released parts of the Papers of Supreme Court Justice William H. [read post]