Search for: "IN RE: JURY ISSUE" Results 801 - 820 of 10,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2013, 9:22 pm by Lanigan & Lanigan
They know how to present cases to juries because they’re experienced litigation lawyers. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Eric Muller
That issue, they said, was resolved in their favor when the jury acquitted them of traveling to commit bribery and of conspiring to commit bribery. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 3:53 am by SHG
  Trying to find a case on point often began with Corpus Juris Secundum, which separated headnotes by West’s key system. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:20 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Judge Muehlfeld also issued a gag order against attorneys and witnesses preventing them from speaking to the news media pre-jury selection. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:53 am by SHG
Nor, as the WSJ Lawblog suggests, is the issue one of juror’s rights, notwithstanding the asinine reverse Batson issue. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 8:21 am by Andrew Delaney
“It’s ambiguous enough that a jury should decide. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:19 am by Jon Hyman
In this case, because Montell faced termination before the June 2 date contemplated by the Amended Final Warning, the court concluded that the adverse action sufficiently deviated from the performance history to create a jury issue over the timing of the termination. [read post]
15 May 2018, 8:44 am by Phil Dixon
Takeaway This was an issue of first impression for North Carolina. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 1:06 pm
Shorter version: Both Fitz and Libby want to keep information about l'affaire du Plame from the jury. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by Albert Gidari
Anyone who wonders how such a motion would turn out should read the Bank of Nova Scotia line of cases: See In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Bank of Nova Scotia), 740 F.2d 817 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1106 (1985); In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Bank of Nova Scotia), 691 F.2d 1384 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 (1983); In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Company A.G., 707 F.2d 663 (2d… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:19 am by Jamison Koehler
Pennsylvania – held that juveniles do not have a right to a jury trial.) [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:45 pm by Jim Walker
Princess Cruises, where the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal addressed the issue whether a raped crewmember can pursue a case before a U.S. jury. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by Philip Thomas
” My Take: It's tragic that a case that cost a ton of money to try has to be re-tried due to a mistake with the jury instructions. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:56 am
In most cases, we’re talking about 6 or 12 jurors on the eventual jury. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
The characterization of the earlier Parker decision as having no precedential value, when it resolved the same legal issues between other parties, and provided notice to other litigants how the Third Circuit resolved the issue, was quite arbitrary.[4] The Third Circuit’s current IOP continues the distinction between precedential and non-precedential opinions. [read post]