Search for: "J. J. and W. J. v. J. B. and J. B." Results 801 - 820 of 1,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Cody SH, Glynn MK, Farrar JA, Cairns KL, Griffin PM, Kobayashi J, Fyfe M, Hoffman R, King AS, Lewis JH, Swaminathan B, Bryant RG, and Vugia DJ. (1999). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[54] Among survivors, at least five percent will suffer end stage renal disease (“ESRD”) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[55] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the issues on appeal by explaining that[w]e review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:05 am by Jon Gelman
    6/25/2015  -  3RDG FINAL PASSAGE   -  Yes {24}  No {12}  Not Voting {4}    -  Roll CallAddiego, Dawn Marie - Not VotingAllen, Diane B. - NoBarnes, Peter J., III - Not VotingBateman, Christopher - NoBeach, James - YesBeck, Jennifer - Not VotingBucco, Anthony R. - NoCardinale, Gerald - NoCodey, Richard J. - YesConnors, Christopher J. - Not VotingCruz-Perez, Nilsa - YesCunningham,… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Dinwoodie: w/o empirical tools, you either end up w/judge as your empirical proxy or judge as normative decider. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
  “[W]hat exactly,” he asks, “was the ‘social harm’ identified by the Reynolds Court? [read post]