Search for: "John Doe County No. 1" Results 801 - 820 of 2,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
During debates over that bill, it came out that a whopping 11 percent of all arrests in Harris County are for Class C misdemeanors, a proportion possibly boosted because of intake screening practices by the Harris County DA. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood provides his best guess about October Term 2017’s last relists. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
“This is a traditional Sherman Act, Section 1, antitrust case. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, the justices ruled 8-1 that the existence of probable cause for arrest does not bar a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim in this case. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:30 am by Colby Pastre
Berkeley, California, voters passed a per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in 2015 that has been followed by Philadelphia, San Francisco, Oakland, and Cook County (Illinois), though Cook County quickly repealed the tax after consumer backlash. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
This week, the Supreme Court declined to reverse course, voting 8–1 to uphold a Minnesota law that automatically terminates life insurance designations upon divorce. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Ad Law Defense
  A week later, Foster Farms was sued for false advertising in a putative class action in Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
The Charity Navigator website does not rate CERT because its annual revenue is below $1 million. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:33 pm by Jim Sedor
State law does not allow candidates to do that. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:38 am by Shea Denning
  The post Does a No Contact Order Apply While the Defendant Is in Jail? [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The California statute simply directs state law enforcement to inspect these detention facilities for violations of law.The federal government objects to such inspections, asserting: (1) that state law singles out these immigration detention facilities for inspection, and does not provide for similar inspection of facilities that are not related to immigration enforcement; and (2) California “has no lawful interest in investigating federal law enforcement efforts. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, since the retainer agreement executed between plaintiffs and the Aboulafia firm, which constitutes “documentary evidence” within the purview of that section (see generally Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 84-85 [2d Dept 2010]), clearly limits the firm’s representation only to commencing a property damage claim against Marine. [read post]