Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 801 - 820 of 1,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Superior Court of California, in which the justices reversed a state court finding of specific personal jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs in a multistate lawsuit, concluding that the “Court has left very little wiggle room for lawyers intent on engaging in forum shopping in distant but friendly courtrooms. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This would be a similar situation as abortion following R. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
  She cares very little (if at all) about the particular intricacies of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wrote a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department court in reinstating Chontay Kirby’s first and only cause of action for discrimination in her 11-page complaint, “Although plaintiff’s first cause of action is labeled as one for ‘hostile workplace,’” the lower court “was not bound by that designation and plaintiff has sufficiently stated a cause of action for employment discrimination under both the New York State… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:53 pm
Because there was so little Massachusetts case law on the subject of punitive damages, the court had to look to federal decisions for guidance. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am by Guest Author
  As Chief Justice Marshall held in the foundational 1804 case of Little v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court Act 2003, which established the new Supreme Court, was enacted soon after. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:34 am by Christopher Spizzirri
The Delaware Court of Chancery came to the same conclusion in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ultimately, I understand why the school districts joined the lawsuit–on the can’t hurt, might help theory that maybe they could get a little money for no additional work on their part. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am by Howard Knopf
Equustek Solutions Inc.,[2017] 1 SCR 824, 2017 SCC 34  if anything already goes further than necessary to protect IP owners, including copyright owners and confirms the jurisdiction of superior courts to issue worldwide deindexing orders. [read post]