Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V" Results 801 - 820 of 8,369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 8:19 am
Garcia, Of Cosmopolis and Community: Globalization and Global Justice Notes and CommentsElisa Baroncini, The "Dolphin-Safe" Labelling Scheme under Consideration in the WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Appellate Body Report in the Case US - Tuna II (Mexico) Steven W. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Further, the court opined, "[w]here substantial evidence exists, the reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency, even if the court would have decided the matter differently" and if substantial evidence supports the administrative decision being challenged, that determination must be sustained "irrespective of whether a similar quantum of evidence is available to support other varying conclusions. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Further, the court opined, "[w]here substantial evidence exists, the reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency, even if the court would have decided the matter differently" and if substantial evidence supports the administrative decision being challenged, that determination must be sustained "irrespective of whether a similar quantum of evidence is available to support other varying conclusions. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Further, the court opined, "[w]here substantial evidence exists, the reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency, even if the court would have decided the matter differently" and if substantial evidence supports the administrative decision being challenged, that determination must be sustained "irrespective of whether a similar quantum of evidence is available to support other varying conclusions. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am by MOTP
Nov. 7, 2017) (explaining that it would be improper to consider matters outside the pleadings in deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion attacking statutory standing); but see Myles v. [read post]