Search for: "MATTER OF JAMES H." Results 801 - 820 of 1,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
One of Austin's core insights is reflected in the title of his William James lectures, delivered at Harvard in 1955, How to Do Things with Words. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Allowing companies to fully and immediately deduct investments in structures is one of the most cost-efficient ways lawmakers can stimulate investment, create jobs, and boost GDP during a post-pandemic recovery. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Daniel Carpenter[1]   The demos must have the exclusive opportunity to decide how matters are to be placed on the agenda of matters that are to be decided by means of the democratic process. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:05 am
  [13]  Legal assistance in both civil and administrative matters is still a "luxury available only to a small segment of society. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:24 am by David Lat
He will be accompanied by Partners James Johnston, Sidney Levinson, Bennett Murphy, Joshua Mester, Counsel Joshua Morse, Monika Weiner and three associates. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
Under the law in its current form, "[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter . . . may obtain a patent therefor. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:00 am by Josh Blackman
As a matter of First Amendment law, Judge Conrad’s opinion is correct. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
(I was reminded of a remark by Justice Robert H. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(See In re James H. (1985) 165 Cal.App.3d 911, 917; In re Ray O. (1979) 97 Cal.App.3d 136, 139–140 [whenever a juvenile enters a plea bargain before a judge he has the right to be sentenced by that same judge].)Even after Arbuckle, however, parties to a plea agreement—i.e., the pleading defendant and the prosecuting attorney—remained free to chart a different course by making explicit on the record that the defendant did not care if the same judge pronounced… [read post]