Search for: "MATTER OF MOORE" Results 801 - 820 of 3,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
 The majority (Huges + Moore) found a sufficient case-or-controversy, while the dissent (Wallach) would have found appellant’s covenant-not-to-sue sufficient to moot the dispute. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:57 am by Gene Quinn
Without an opinion, on August 13, 2013, the Federal Circuit panel (consisting of Judges Prost, Moore and O’Malley) affirmed the Final Determination. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Thus we affirm that claim 1 is not directed to patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:53 am
 However, Judge Moore emphasized that the question of patentable subject matter under § 101 is not a simpler grounds than obviousness. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
” Author informationJon RobinsonMember at Mouledoux, Bland, Legrand & BrackettAs a Member at Mouledoux, Bland, Legrand & Brackett, Jon Robinson focuses his practice on the representation of employers and carriers in matters arising under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, the Defense Base Act, and the War Hazards Compensation Act. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 5:34 pm
Hart and Anthony Honore wrote a whole book about it, and Michael Moore has one coming out later this year. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Although Natural Alternatives was precedential, its statement regarding Skidmore deference was admittedly dicta by Judge Moore. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
 Moreover, once the information is posted online, the site operator has no obligation to take it down, no matter how offensive, defamatory, or harmful it may be. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:05 am
This extra mass gives them an advantage in crashes," says Matt Moore, HLDI vice president. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:37 am by Dennis Crouch
The disagreement between the majority (Moore & O’Malley) and Dissent-in-Part (Wallach) comes over the definition of the claim term “unlaunched state. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 1 | Ellen Goodman (Rutgers), Moderator  Access and Development: The History of ‘Development’ and WIPOSara Bannerman (McMaster University)Commentator | Christopher S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:33 am by Eric E. Johnson
Moore was brave enough to take the issue to internal affairs. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The final words of Judge Moore's concurring remarks, in which the limitation on "may disparage" is questioned onconstitutional grounds:We have yet to be presented with any substantial government interests that would justify the PTO’s refusal to register disparaging marks. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:12 pm by Ray Dowd
Dowd, was selected as the text for Columbia University School of Law’s “Copyright Dispute Resolution Externship,” taught by Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP  partners David Kappos and David Marriott. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
 Judge Moore provided a notable dissent arguing that UMass is an indispensable party and should be a named defendant and the case is in fact a controversy between two states. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Access to justice and research innovation were important topics at the recent World Justice Forum 2022 and the Annual Summit of Canada’s Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:42 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Stephen Cutler, Michael Osnato, Meaghan Kelly and M Moore of the Simpson Thacher law firm take a closer look at the Court’s opinion and consider its implications. [read post]