Search for: "MS v. AS "
Results 801 - 820
of 13,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2023, 1:34 am
Ms. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Per the Court, this “supports the inference that Ms. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 7:08 am
The focus of the article is Ms. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 8:24 am
In Gbadehan v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
Ms M Forstater v CGD Europe & Ors [2022] UKET 2200909/2019: In the long-running saga of Ms Forstater’s dismissal from her Visiting Fellowship with CGD Europe, a subsidiary of a US global poverty think-tank, because of her critical views on transgender issues as expressed on her personal Twitter account, the Tribunal upheld complaints of direct discrimination because of belief in respect of the decisions not to offer Ms Forstater an employment contract… [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
Ms. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:07 am
In De Wilde v The Netherlands [2021] ECHR No 9476/19, which we discussed here, Ms De Wilde, a Pastafarian, had applied for a new driving licence and a new identity card with a picture of her wearing a colander on her head. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
Although Ms. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm
Vardy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:04 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:05 am
In Chiles v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Dana and Ms. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:28 am
We know from Kramer v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
The claimant, Ms Sooka, who serves as the executive Director of the International Truth and Justice Project, was able to make a statement of fact correcting false information published about her by a former UK representative of a Sri Lankan political party after filing a data protection claim. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
Before filing a civil action against talc product suppliers, Bell filed workers’ compensation against two textile industry employers.[12] Judge Osteen’s opinion in Bell documents the anxious zeal that plaintiffs’ counsel brought to bear in trying to suppress the true nature of Ms. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm
In the present case, the mere passing of time did not render the information irrelevant and as Ms. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:59 am
I § 7) Here is the complaint: Geraghty v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
The Court concluded that Ms. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:02 am
As such, GDPR did not apply (David Scott v LGBT Foundation Ltd [2020] EWHC 483 applied). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 5:05 am
Ms. [read post]
