Search for: "Majors v. United States of America" Results 801 - 820 of 2,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
In the majority's view, the fact that the U.S. had bound itself to "undertake[] to comply" with ICJ rulings under the United Nations' Charter did not change the equation. [read post]
A majority of fed cattle in the United States are sold to packing plants and processed into various beef products. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
  The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The United States of America should be permitted to do so, if at all, only in response to the most pressing concerns. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 11:30 pm by Eric Segall
As late as the 19th century, there were blasphemy convictions in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm by Levin Papantonio
I am elated that the 3rd Circuit sided on behalf of the thousands of ovarian cancer victims, each of whom are entitled to their day in court by the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In all but New York, the Republicans control the state house and the governor’s office by a large majority. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Plaintiffs claimed that, had Telmex honored their right to negotiate an exchange of their Conecel units for America Movil shares, plaintiffs would have owned America Movil shares worth more than $1 billion as of May 30, 2008 (the date of the complaint). [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
In Security Pacific National Bank v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by Michael Risch
Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent and Trial Appeal Board by the America Invents Act of 2011 have transformed the relationship between Article III patent litigation and the administrative state. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]