Search for: "Mark Strong" Results 801 - 820 of 10,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
" Furthermore, both words are arbitrary as applied to wine; thus SECOLO is conceptually strong as a trademark. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:37 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark ELECTRIC JELLYFISH, finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark AGUAMALA, both marks in standard character form and both for beer. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
With respect to dilution by blurring, Starbucks argues "Applicant's mark carries strong negative connotations because the term 'Jew Bucks' has been used pejoratively and derogatively to describe opposer and/or opposer's connection with people of the Jewish faith or ethnicity". [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:23 am
" What I think the Board should be doing is to ask if the senior user's mark is a relatively stronger or weaker mark in the context of this case. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:00 am by Brad Walz
A thoughtful trademark application filing strategy is key to establishing a strong commercial brand. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm by Unknown
Trade mark law firms tend to invoice in dollars or other relatively strong currencies. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:16 am by INFORRM
These “experts” are subsequently named – Mark Stephens, Brian Eagles and, curiously, Max Clifford – who “also blasted the ruling – even though it will BENEFIT his clients“. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:00 pm
Avvo's chief executive Mark Britton scored an 8.0. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
Growth was seen in each and every service line and geographic region delivered strong growth. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:16 am by John L. Welch
Triumph Learning contended that "fame" in the 2(d) context is merely a colloquial way of saying that the mark is very strong along a sliding scale, but that the standard of fame for dilution purposes requires a higher, yes-or-no, test. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:29 am by Camilla Hrdy
(p. 16)As someone who lacks a strong view on whether this provision of the Lanham Act should be struck down as unconstitutional, I am just enjoying hearing the examples...and seeing the Justices squirm a bit:JUSTICE GORSUCH: I don't want to -- I don't want to go through the examples. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The decision is important for owners of a sub brands which appear may, in some circumstances, avoid a likelihood of confusion if consistently being associated with a strong house brand. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There is, in fact, a strong argument in favour of an Article 10 “right of reply”. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:23 am
Incontestable Status Safer also argued that the incontestability of its registrations for DEER AWAY and DEER AWAY PROFESSIONAL provided statutory evidence of the strength of its marks, while OMS responded that "incontestable status does not make a weak mark strong. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Posted by Frank Kurre, Protiviti; Mark Rogers, BoardProspects; and Michael Tae, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Editor's Note: Frank Kurre is a Managing Director at Protiviti, Mark Rogers is Founder and CEO at BoardProspects, and Michael Tae is Co-President at Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Posted by Frank Kurre, Protiviti; Mark Rogers, BoardProspects; and Michael Tae, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Editor's Note: Frank Kurre is a Managing Director at Protiviti, Mark Rogers is Founder and CEO at BoardProspects, and Michael Tae is Co-President at Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In Bose, in comparing WAVE and ACOUSTIC WAVE with POWERWAVE, this court found that the “presence of the root element WAVE, upon this court’s review, introduces a strong similarity in all three marks,” Bose, 293 F.3d at 1378, although in that case the goods were not identical, for the POWERWAVE product was an amplifier rather than a radio.ANDThere is a heavy burden on the newcomer to avoid con- sumer confusion as to products and their source. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:07 pm by James Hastings
  This factor, as well as the unique connotation and strong commercial impression of Applicant’s mark helped to distinguish it from Opposer’s mark. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:25 am by HR Daily Advisor Staff
But when we hit a little after the 30-day mark, they started showing up late and with a very negative attitude. [read post]