Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 9,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”Id. at 454–55 (citation , alterations, andinternal quotation marks omitted).See also Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  It likewise uses “names and insignia of contemporary forces such as the National Security Agency, the United States Marine Corps, and the United States Air Force. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
§292(b) is unconstitutional under the Take Care Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
Further, VICC failed to establish that its two marks had acquired secondary meaning (VI Carnival Committee Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 9/6/11Cite: Mobile Mark, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ferencz Matiangai Sirleaf, Rendering Whiteness Visible International Decisions Julien Chaisse & Kehinde Folake Olaoye, United States—Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/R Faith O. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
From the humble beginnings in 2002 of sales out of the trunk of a car, Opposer has built one of the most recognized jewelry brands in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 11:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
Tomorrow, October 24, is United Nations Day (UN Day), which marks the 75th anniversary of the creation of the United Nations. [read post]