Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Montana Department of Revenue, Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
And unkind reader of the evolving dispute over the Louboutin red sole trade mark in the United States might be forgiven for saying that murky rules of unclear application are found there too. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The conservative justices have embraced the view, incubated in the Reagan Administration’s Department of Justice, that the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:00 pm
Roberts Jr., chief justice of the United States — at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
Although the United States is part of international refugee agreements that provide asylum for persons with a “well-founded fear of persecution,” U.S. refugee protections have marked gaps. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
After all, there are very few courts of equity left in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Today, same-sex unions represent a tiny share of marriages in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:59 am
RELATED:Court Rejects Professor’s TSA Pat-Down Challenge How TSA PreCheck May Have Kept This Former Pilot Out Of Court Frequent Flyer’s Supreme Court Case Concluded Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
The challenge was based on the United States Supreme Court's 2010 case New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
