Search for: "Matter of Adler" Results 801 - 820 of 1,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 9:10 am by velvel
THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICESTHE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE(PDF of transcript)WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2012 9:30 A.M.? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Kochs also offered to delay this entire matter until after the 2012 elections. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:09 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) The commentary on the Koch-Cato continues to multiply. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This view is, from what I can tell, widely shared among libertarians who have posted about the matter. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Insofar as the goal of an organization like Cato is to influence public policy, public perception matters. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:18 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 They will forevermore characterize the Cato Institute as “Koch-controlled” — and, as a legal matter, they will be correct. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Gleick may have violated relevant state laws, and Heartland has apparently referred the matter to the FBI and is considering civil actions. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Gleick seems aware of this possibility, as he has retained a lawyer (and a “crisis manager’) on this matter. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Yet this has not yet put the matter to rest. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Notes Jonathan Adler, pointing to this video: But of course, the government is arguing in the Supreme Court that the individual mandate is a tax, authorized by Congress's taxing power. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Dan Bushell
This issue is discussed more in-depth at Volokh Conspiracy by Case Western Law Professor Jonathan Adler.] [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Ritika Singh
” Now the Secret Service is “looking into” the matter. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:23 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
There was attention drawn to the matter in 2008, with FCC involvement. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:59 am by John Elwood
   The problem was, as Jonathan Adler noted below, that the White House wouldn’t say publicly whether it had consulted the Justice Department. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Yale’s Bruce Ackerman, writing in the WSJ, calls for the White House to release the legal memorandum upon which President Obama based his decision to make several recess appointments while the Senate claimed not to be in recess. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
In an op-ed article for Slate addressed to those who would second-guess the drafting of the Affordable Care Act, Simon Lazarus contends that “there is no way opponents [of health care] would have failed to take it all the way to the Supreme Court, no matter how it was drafted. [read post]