Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones" Results 801 - 820 of 3,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp., 137 AD3d 1252, 1254, quoting Mirzoeff v Nagar, 52 AD3d 789, 789; see Matter of Chana J.A. v Barry S., 135 AD3d 743, 744; Walter v Jones, Sledzik, Garneau & Nardone, LLP, 67 AD3d 671, 672). [read post]
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]
We will likely find out this year, as Judge Jones of the United States District Court, Western District of Washington, is set to rule on the matter. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
Both the subcontract and the sub-subcontract contain identical arbitration provisions: 11.3.3 ARBITRATION If the matter is unresolved after submission of the matter to a mitigation procedure or mediation, a demand for arbitration may be served by either Party. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:21 am
Edward Jones Hit With $2 Million ADA Damages In FINRA Arbitration In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Rodney Hunter Schurg, Claimant, v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am by CMS
It is delivered on a unanimous basis by seven Justices of the UK Supreme Court (including the two Scottish Justices, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge, together with the Northern Irish Justice, Lord Kerr, and Welsh Justice, Lord Lloyd-Jones). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
The same law also provides that “[a] person who is unconscious or otherwise not capable of withdrawing consent is presumed not to have withdrawn consent,” which as a practical matter allows the state to draw an unconscious person’s blood if the police have probable cause to suspect drunk driving. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Magazine ($4.6m including economic loss, later reduced by $3.9m), Wagners v Alan Jones ($3.7m) and now Rush v Daily Telegraph (judgment reserved) are not the whole story. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Philip Bobbitt
Jones seems to suggest that, at least in civil matters, this should not be a decisive concern in determining whether to make the president liable to suit. [read post]