Search for: "Merck and Co," Results 801 - 820 of 1,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Rose Hughes
 The Australian patent office (APO) found that the deadline had been missed for the PTE application (Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd et al [2020] APO 43). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:57 am
``This can't help'' the drug's sales, Gordon Tomaselli, a spokesman for the American Heart Association and a cardiologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, said in an interview at the European Society of Cardiology conference in Munich today.Source.By accessing this site, you are agreeing to comply with and be bound by the terms of use agreement and privacy policy. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Merck & Co.,, No. 267003, 2006 WL 1628516, at *3 (Mich. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:33 am
Merck & Co., the Third Circuit held that plaintiffs who opt out of a securities class action are not precluded under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA) from bringing state law fraud claims in follow-on individual actions, even if federal claims are time-barred. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
.; British Telecommunications plc; British-American Tobacco Co Ltd; BTG plc; Delphi Corp.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd; Microsoft Ltd; Nestle UK Ltd; Nokia UK Ltd; NXP Semiconductors UK Limited; Pfizer Ltd; Philips Electronics UK Ltd; Pilkington Group Ltd; Procter… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Merck & Co., 948 A.2d 587, 590 (N.J. 2008), held that CFA was subsumed by the state's product liability act and thus did not provide a separate cause of action.Anyway, two weeks later, we've now discovered (we get sent good news, but not bad news, it seems), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that, generally, a request for a refund is not a prerequisite to bring suit under the CFA:In theory, there may be circumstances in which requiring a pre-suit demand for relief… [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Merck & Co., Inc., 2015 FCA 171 http://t.co/G4goh669v3 -> International Copyright Law: text and cases reviewed http://t.co/8NrWHS7n1b -> Digitised out-of-print books and authors' rights: a new question for the CJEU http://t.co/5u3xGwSDDK -> How to Discipline Cyber-Snooping Employees http://t.co/qVT4wPRUyv -> Update on the UK Private Copying Exception http://t.co/J0oW4n6Ftc -> Is Amazon Liable For IP Violations By Its Marketplace Vendors? [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 4:40 am
Court Attacks Applicability of Attorney-Client Privilege to In-House Counsel Back in August, a federal district court ordered Merck & Co. to produce thousands of internal electronic documents which the company had vigorously argued were protected by the attorney-client privilege, and held that communications by a lawyer acting in a business capacity are not privileged. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:52 am by Bob Kraft
" The story reports on payments by Eli Lilly and Co., down 46 percent since 2009; GlaxoSmithKline down 29 percent. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:07 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
NuvaRing, a contraceptive device marketed by Organon Pharmaceuticals and Merck & Co., has been named in some 300 product liability lawsuits. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. [read post]