Search for: "Mines v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 3,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2021, 6:42 am by Donald Dinnie
The Supreme Court of Appeal, in Pelham Stephanus Bothma and Others v Tertius Bothma N.O and Another (Case number 748/2019) [2021] ZASCA 46 (15 April 2021), re-affirmed the position regarding the interpretation of legal documents, re-stating the principle that only admissible evidence of context, conservatively applied, may be led in resolving an interpretation dispute. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
The case concerns two sites on Navajo tribal lands that the Navajo Nation alleges were contaminated by World War II and Cold War era uranium mining. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm by Jim Gerl
National Archives) OK this is a pet peeve of mine. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Skoufis is a state senator from Orange County; his office was right across the street from mine in Chester, N.Y., before we relocated to New Paltz. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 11:12 am by Erin
Union Colliery Co v Bryden (1899) Coal Mines Regulation Act Cunningham v Tomey Homma (1903) Female Employment Act (1912) Quong Wing v the King (1914) [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
“The agency completed fewer systemic investigations (i.e., 260 v. 300), recovered less despite more settlements (i.e., recovered $13 million in monetary relief in 78 voluntary agreements v. $40 million in 63 voluntary agreements) and filed fewer systemic lawsuits (i.e., 17 v. 21 systemic lawsuits). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:53 am by Carl Folsom
Here is a nice article from the Wichita Eagle highlighting the recent oral argument in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:18 am
Transcript here and audio here.Mandatory EEOC ConciliationMach Mining v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am by Marcia Narine
The mine had been shut down 48 times in the previous year and reopened once violations were fixed. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:41 am by Ronald Mann
  The deep thinkers of federal jurisdictional theory will doubtless mull the gratuitous explication in footnote 8 of Shoshone Mining Co. v. [read post]