Search for: "Mr. X" Results 801 - 820 of 2,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Brown, Johns Manville's president, that the X-rays of seven asbestos mill workers showed clear signs of asbestosis. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:46 am by Jon Hyman
      Related StoriesOSHA suggests employer best practices for anti-retaliation programs… and an early contender for worst employer of the yearWhen a self-fondling supervisor earns the nickname “Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Mr de Freitas could and did properly consider the publication to be in the public interest; and that a judgment in favour of Mr Economou would represent an interference with Mr de Freitas’ free speech rights out of any reasonable proportion to the need to protect and vindicate Mr Economou’s reputation. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm by familoo
And we also first heard in June about the re-hearing of a fact finding hearing in relation to a now adopted child, with a view to the parents attempting subsequently to challenge the adoption orders (Re X (A Child)). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Just over a year ago, AIPPI hosted a Rapid Response seminar following Mr Justice Arnold finding that the material claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of pain were invalid and in any event not infringed by Actavis’ skinny label pregabalin product Lecaent (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
“There was a strong objection on behalf of the father and mother to Mr Culshaw acting as McKenzie Friend since he, too, is undoubtedly a campaigner, who participated in several of the protests I have mentioned. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Telegraph and Daily Mail seemed to just copy The Suns errors in reporting Re X, Y and Z (Disclosure to the security service): the full blog is here. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm by Schachtman
App’x 102, 104 (3d Cir. 2011). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
Wednesday’s session opens up with Jim Harrington, counsel for Ramzi Binalshibh arguing in favor of 152JJJ, a request for testimonial immunity for Abu Zubaydah in connection with Binalshibh’s motion to hold the guards in contempt for poor camp conditions. [read post]