Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 801 - 820 of 3,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2018, 8:43 am by Beth Graham
  About three months later, AT&T filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking to compel arbitration and to stay the State Court case. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am by Adam Wiseberg
In February 2020, Defendant relocated to New Jersey with the child. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:51 am by Jon L. Gelman
 Background and Key IssuesThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed an interlocutory appeal brought by the New Jersey Staffing Alliance, the American Staffing Association, and the New Jersey Business & Industry Association (collectively, the "Staffing Associations"). [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in McIntyre, holding that, because a machinery manufacturer never engaged in activities in New Jersey with the intent to invoke or benefit from the protection of the State’s laws, New Jersey lacked personal jurisdiction over the company under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm by Robert Geist
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:35 am
United States, 943 F.Supp. 159, 168 (D.R.I.1996) (articulating the circuit split); see also Ugo Colella & Adam Bain, The Burden of Proving Jurisdiction Under the Federal Torts Claim Act: A Uniform Approach to Allocation, 67 Fordham L.Rev. 2859 (1999). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Lindsay Burke
Ehling was later terminated for attendance reasons, and she brought suit alleging invasion of privacy under New Jersey state law as well as violations of the SCA, among other claims. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
 Writing for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the effect that the Court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:56 am
., a medical device company based in New Jersey, has agreed to pay the United States $48.26 million to resolve claims that it knowingly caused false claims to be submitted to the Medicare. [read post]