Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 801 - 820 of 1,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
Speakers include Mr Justice Arnold (High Court of Justice, London), Judge Rian Kalden (Court of Appeal of The Hague), Hon. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:32 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Phillip Newman was actually her supervising physician. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:59 am by Dennis Crouch
  Morinville appealed the other rejections and filed his appeal brief in 2010. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:18 pm
  With this in mind I have been writing about individuals who I think would lead the Patent Office in the right direction, such as Judge Pauline Newman of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Dr. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 11:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Judges Newman, Lourie, Bryson, and Dyk are all eligible to take senior status. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
Six separate opinions (totaling 127 pages) were issued by judges stating their agreement or disagreement with the result in the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
CiscoOf the issues on appeal:Cisco appeals the district court decision on severalgrounds. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
In dissent, Judge Newman stepped on that sticky wad. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:00 am by Rantanen
  In support of her view, Judge Newman points to the disconnect between "lacks substantial merit" and the standard applied by everyone besides the Federal Circuit. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the Court of Appeals (Newman and Lohier, with Jacobs in dissent) says the channel is a state actor for First Amendment purposes, and therefore may be sued.The majority parses a lengthy Supreme Court ruling, Denver Areas Educ. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff was also assaulted on the job in retaliation for his speech and had false accusations lodged against him.It may look like plaintiff has a case, but he does not, the Court of Appeals (Newman, Lee and Nathan) says, because plaintiff did not speak on a matter of public concern, a necessary requirement for maintaining a First Amendment retaliation claim. [read post]