Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
” (Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17) – read David Hart’s post on this case for a detailed exposition of Lord Sumption’s analysis of the ingredients of harassment. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
For example, the House of Lords recently said a right to be forgotten was unworkable. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am
That’s what people mainly complain about. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
I think that Tom Bingham very much took the lead in this regard when he was Senior Law Lord. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
” In Jonathan Aitken v the Guardian (1997 CA) Lord Bingham followed Denning: “An important consideration in favour of a jury arises where, as here, the case involves prominent figures in public life and questions of great national interest. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:26 am
These are two interrelated issues in fiduciary duty litigation, and Tatum v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
The incarnation of the people of England (represented as was customary for the time by its classes―king, lords temporal and spiritual, and commons) would have viewed an unconstrained common law as constraining its ability to “make” law, that is to use the power of commanding behavior instrumentally. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:22 am
Bleyer brought his claim in the NSW Supreme Court over seven items published as Google search results to three people. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Moyle, D.C.L. of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law,Fellow and Late Tutor of New College, OxfordFifth Edition (1913)http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5983/5983-h/5983-h.htm * PROOEMIVM *In the name of Our Lord, Jesus Christ. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm
They were as follows: Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
In both types of cases, the social landlord is pursuing proceedings in order to recover property that might be used to provide accommodation for other homeless people. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Lord have mercy, judges and lawyers must now actually read and analyze the bases of expert witnesses’ opinions, assess validity of studies and conclusions, and present their challenges and evaluations in clear, non-technical language. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
Will a lot of people seek to sneak survey evidence is, even where it shouldn't be? [read post]
