Search for: "Precision Medical, Inc."
Results 801 - 820
of 866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
John Hudson Farms, Inc., NO: 7:18-CV-7-FL, 13 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
Actavis, Inc., 593 F.3d 428, 431-32 (5th Cir. 2010).So the first (mis)step on the road to allowing common-law plaintiffs to attack the mere presence on the market of an FDA-approved drug is recognition of a presumption against preemption on the ground that it’s “traditional” for states to make yes/no decisions on whether drugs are safe enough to be sold.Guided by this misapplied presumption, Wimbush held that it was not “impossible” for the defendant to comply… [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
John Hudson Farms, Inc., NO: 7:18-CV-7-FL, 13 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In a term involving no major religion cases, the Court passed over a First Amendment challenge - Teen Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Shearson/American Express, Inc.: “If a precedent of this Court has direct application in a case, yet appears to rest on reasons rejected in some other line of decisions, the [lower courts] should follow the case which directly controls, leaving to this Court the prerogative of overruling its own decisions. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
Only if we've got a really powerful defense, like preemption in In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
The Norges Bank also announced the exclusion of Evergy Inc and Washington H. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
However, “it is neither possible nor advisable to attempt to identify, in the abstract, the precise nature and degree of ‘substantial support,’ or the precise characteristics of ‘associated forces,’ that are or would be sufficient to bring persons and organizations within the foregoing framework . . . . [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
”8 It is well established that product labels and packaging can be protected by copyright.9 This avenue, then, would be a non-starter for defending against including consumer goods in the importation provision — indeed, it is precisely because of the low bar for copyrightability that such goods are within its scope. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
.”8 It is well established that product labels and packaging can be protected by copyright.9 This avenue, then, would be a non-starter for defending against including consumer goods in the importation provision — indeed, it is precisely because of the low bar for copyrightability that such goods are within its scope. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
I describe these decisions as anomalous because they seem to permit precisely what Title VII forbids: treating employees differently on the basis of sex. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
The requirements permits two exemptions, medical and religious. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
(Supreme Court blocks COVID-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for workplaces but lets medical rule stand) The opinion--delivered per curiam--the concurrence, and the dissent are straightforward. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Kirby Inland Marine Inc., 482 F.3d 347 (2007) (affirming the exclusion of Dr. [read post]
