Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE" Results 801 - 820 of 1,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 7:22 am by Jay Willis
Also in the Washington Post, Robert Barnes previews Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
“At least five Justices agreed the Individual Mandate reads more naturally as a command to buy health insurance than as a tax, and those five Justices agreed the mandate could not pass muster under the Interstate Commerce Clause,” District Judge Reed O’Connor wrote in Texas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:22 am by Ilya Somin
After all, as I explained in one of my earliest posts on Comstock, the statute upheld in that case was “rationally related” to the regulation of interstate commerce as that power was defined by the Court in cases such as Gonzales v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
In this case, by contrast, the opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts displays a confident and assertive verve, full of quotable maxims certain to populate the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The argument over the extent of the power granted by the commerce clause is nothing new; anyone who has been to law school is familiar with Wickard v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The argument over the extent of the power granted by the commerce clause is nothing new; anyone who has been to law school is familiar with Wickard v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. [read post]