Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 7:04 am
Hasen's Specialty": At the web site of the University of California, Irvine School of Law, Rex Bossert has this profile of law professor Rick Hasen, author of the "Election Law Blog. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
This is Rick Hasen’s view of the case: the government’s case is difficult, but plausible, because if the government can prove Edwards and the donors “really intended” the money to benefit his campaign, then a crime will have been committed. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
Journal has more here, and also check out election law expert Rick Hasen at Slate. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:52 am
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) You can read the indictment here. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:42 am
" The editorial also praises law professor Rick Hasen's "Election Law Blog. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:45 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) The single subject requirement is a technical rule that is often used to invalidate voter initiatives, either before or after they go to the ballot. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:46 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) A popular tactic for fighting a ballot initiative is to claim it violates the single subject rule, leaving it to a panel of judges to decide its fate and possibly prevent it from reaching the voters. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) Following up on this post, I have posted the supplemental briefs filed in this case. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:26 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) In yesterday’s post, we explained the basics of the “single subject” rule: initiatives may contain only one “subject” or they are unenforceable. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:39 pm
(Thanks to Rick Hasen, of the University of California, Irvine School of Law, for the heads-up about the new briefing order. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:33 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) Eugene blogged last week about United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:40 am
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) Many thanks to Eugene for giving us the opportunity to blog about our article, Aggressive Enforcement of the Single Subject Rule (pdf) which appeared recently in the Election Law Journal’s special symposium issue honoring the scholarship of election law pioneer, Dan Lowenstein.The single subject rule — a requirement that initiatives embrace only one subject — is a favorite tool for groups seeking to strike an… [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:39 am
If there is a plea bargain the case will not be appealed, and the ruling will stand.Professor Rick Hasen who runs the Election Law Blog believes the case will be overturned on appeal, or at least be reconsidered. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:31 pm
Rick Hasen (UC Irvine) and Prof. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:44 am
At his Election Law blog, Rick Hasen writes that he expects that Cacheris’s ruling will be overturned given that the Supreme Court in 2003, in FEC v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:07 am
Rick Hasen (Election Law Blog). [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:14 am
" And at his "Election Law Blog," Rick Hasen has a post titled "Federal District Court, in Criminal Case, Holds That Ban on Direct Corporate Contributions to Candidates is Unconstitutional under Citizens United. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:38 am
"Eighth Circuit Upholds Minnesota Ban on Direct Corporate Contributions to Candidates, Minnesota Corporate IE Disclosure Rules": Rick Hasen has this post at his "Election Law Blog" about a ruling that the U.S. [read post]
Constitutional to Ban Corporate Contributions to Candidates (as Opposed to Independent Expenditures)
16 May 2011, 9:20 am
Rick Hasen (Election Law Blog) for the pointer. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:16 pm
Rick Hasen reminds us that the language of the law is not that of biology (go to the post for links):The Southern Fried Scientist says a new Florida statute aimed against bestiality actually bans sexual activity between humans. [read post]
